[ad_1]
Re: “Conservative justices appear skeptical of agencies’ regulatory power” [Jan. 17, Nation & World Politics]:
The Supreme Court docket is getting ready to gutting the regulatory capacity of presidency companies.
How many people bear in mind the case of thalidomide? It was marketed all over the world within the Nineteen Fifties and Nineteen Sixties as a drug to be taken by pregnant girls for nausea. At the moment we all know it induced extreme congenital deformities and toddler loss of life. The one factor that stood between the U.S. and the horror the remainder of the world confronted was the Meals and Drug Administration and a single regulator, a girl, Frances Kelsey. She rejected the drug and prevented numerous tragedies.
The American client desires protections from planes that fall out of the air, automobiles that burst into flame, banks that cheat the patron. All method of issues that the “little man” can’t pressure enterprise into offering however the authorities can.
Do you want your bacon and eggs within the morning? Would you like them freed from illness? It’s these pesky laws that implement a protected meals chain.
Don’t name then laws, name them protections.
Thank the Supreme Court docket when “caveat emptor,” purchaser beware, will apply to all the things within the title of defending us from these pesky laws.
Karren Gratt, Redmond
[ad_2]
Source link