[ad_1]
To the Editor:
Re “‘Barbie’ Is Bad. There, I Said It,” by Pamela Paul (column, Jan. 26):
Ms. Paul has no humorousness. There, I mentioned it.
After studying her column, I get the vibe that any movie that rides on satire, humor and a plethora of pink just isn’t worthy of great creative consideration.
It’s a slight that Greta Gerwig and Margot Robbie didn’t get Oscar nominations for greatest director and greatest actress. The film was buoyant and amusing and poked enjoyable at everybody: the ladies who have to be stunning, the lads who must dominate ladies, the company greed, and the management of photographs and toys.
“Barbie” just isn’t a “dangerous” film, however you want a humorousness to understand it.
Let’s loosen up, Hollywood. I, for one, am getting uninterested in miserable movies. I need to be entertained and challenged in a enjoyable method. Greta Gerwig and Margot Robbie deserved to be nominated.
Felicia Carparelli
Chicago
To the Editor:
Thanks to Pamela Paul for her finely barbed Barbie breakdown, and for making it OK to not love-Love-LOVE!! the film.
I wished to love it, actually I did.
I’d sashayed into the theater sporting my pink pants and scarfing popcorn, solely to trudge out two hours later feeling like … possibly I missed one thing?
The encircling hoopla was partly responsible for my letdown. However past the hype, the movie’s odd mélange of man-bashing and stagy hamming felt each over my head and under my expectations. I hit all-time low at Gloria’s much-lauded monologue, which I discovered to be cringeworthy and clichéd.
Maybe I’m the improper sort of feminist, but it surely’s good to know I’m not alone!
Julie Porcella Rolland
Quincy-sous-Senart, France
To the Editor:
I believe Pamela Paul misses the purpose of “Barbie.” It was by no means meant to be a deep mental endeavor. It was intelligent, enjoyable, raucous and rowdy. It poked enjoyable at cultural experiences many people (ladies) discovered acquainted. It was uplifting and completely happy, and the packed theater viewers after I attended was completely gleeful.
Was it a kids’s film? No — and it in all probability shouldn’t have been marketed that method. Greatest image? No, in fact not. Nevertheless it was a wink and a nod to societal points that many ladies “of a sure age” and presumably youthful can definitely relate to and chortle about.
I loved it immensely. Isn’t {that a} adequate cause to make a movie?
Jamie Grossman
Malvern, Pa.
To the Editor:
Pamela, Pamela, Pamela, how very courageous of you to step behind the cotton sweet curtain and expose the wizard! Pay attention, I assumed the film was enjoyable however the message … preachy and treacly. I didn’t put on pink to the theater.
That mentioned, I positive did love my Nineteen Sixties Barbie, and she or he deserved a biopic ultimately.
Thanks for a terrific opinion piece. It, not like the film, was flawless.
Carla Johnson
Atlanta
To the Editor:
Simply the headline of Pamela Paul’s column — “‘Barbie’ Is Unhealthy. There, I Stated It” — was a aid to me. I used to be feeling that not liking this film would one way or the other label me as a misogynist.
I’m pro-feminist, however discovered the film to be misandrous. No man had a redeeming high quality. The Mattel board was represented as all males, when in actuality it is half women. Ladies have been represented nicely: The characters portrayed by America Ferrera (Gloria) and Kate McKinnon (Bizarre Barbie) offered as sturdy ladies. It was as if all of Barbie’s issues have been attributable to males, and males are past redemption.
David J. Melvin
Chester, N.J.
Trump’s Effort to Scuttle a Border Deal
To the Editor:
Re “Deal on Border in Peril as Trump Wields Influence” (entrance web page, Jan. 26):
With Democratic and Republican senators apparently on the verge of reaching a historic bipartisan deal that will dramatically change border coverage and curtail the circulate of unlawful immigrants, and with President Biden stating his willingness to assist the deal, Donald Trump is telling Republicans to scuttle the deal.
As Senator Mitt Romney stated on national TV, Mr. Trump is keen to torpedo a deal that will assist resolve the border drawback in order that he could have a difficulty to assist himself within the election. If Mr. Trump succeeds on this outrage, the American public must be informed loudly and in unambiguous phrases who’s accountable for the continued border disaster and for killing a bipartisan answer: Donald Trump.
Democrats shouldn’t go away it as much as Mr. Trump, or to his propagandists at Fox Information, to unfold lies about border coverage or the failure of a bipartisan answer or to deceive the American folks about so essential a difficulty within the election. President Biden ought to go on nationwide tv, in a proper televised tackle, informing People about precisely what was proposed and Mr. Trump’s function in subverting it.
Democrats ought to instantly run advertisements throughout the nation spelling out clearly and unambiguously the bipartisan deal that they have been keen to endorse and Mr. Trump’s accountability for killing it.
Too many People need a answer to the border drawback. If Mr. Trump is keen to kill it, there must be little question within the minds of these voters who’s accountable.
David S. Elkind
Greenwich, Conn.
To the Editor:
The refusal by Republicans in Congress to log off on the bipartisan Ukraine and border safety deal is political gamesmanship at its worst. Donald Trump’s name to torpedo the laws, ostensibly as a result of it’s gentle on deportations and asylum, amongst different issues, is a ruse.
It’s no secret that Mr. Trump actually believes that undocumented immigrants are “poisoning the blood of our nation,” however his motivation to cease the invoice extends past defending People towards ethnic “air pollution” or flaws within the proposed laws. It’s rooted in Mr. Trump’s disdain for Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
In 2019, President Trump sought to commerce army help for political favors, however Mr. Zelensky demurred, and the tried extortion ignited an impeachment inquiry. For Mr. Trump, opposition to the Ukraine and border safety laws is greater than a political tactic; it’s private.
Jane Larkin
Tampa, Fla.
To the Editor:
That a complete political get together is unwilling to behave on border safety with a purpose to appease a single personal citizen who occurs to be operating for president — along with being a slap within the face to their hundreds of thousands of constituents — tells you all you might want to find out about Republicans right now.
Bruce Ellerstein
New York
[ad_2]
Source link