[ad_1]
To the Editor:
Re “Predators Leer as Moms Put Girls on Instagram” (entrance web page, Feb. 25):
I simply completed studying your article exploring this proliferating phenomenon of mothers posting footage of their generally scantily clad underage daughters on the social media platform Instagram. They’re successfully promoting their daughters’ pictures to generate revenue.
I discovered points of this apply to be fairly disturbing. These youngsters could also be harassed by oglers and pedophiles. They must dwell with the aftermath of their moms’ choices with out understanding the short- and long-range implications. It smacks of kid abuse, for my part.
The second main concern that struck me is the absence of any reference to Dad. The place are these males whereas their wives or ex-wives are posting these images? May all these mothers be single mother and father? I believe not.
Stan Feinberg
Wantagh, N.Y.
To the Editor:
It isn’t solely moms who’re lining their private household pockets on the backs of their daughters. Dean Stockton, who runs a clothes enterprise that additionally income from these Instagram accounts, is quoted as saying, “So generally you bought to make use of issues of this world to get you the place it’s good to be, so long as it’s not harming anybody.”
Not harming anybody? Anybody who’s making the most of the proliferation of pedophiles and sexual predators is contributing to an important evil in our society.
I can’t assist however take into account the daughters of the grownup account managers as victims. These younger ladies and youths are being raised with a twisted and false sense of value and for what function? Cash? Celeb? Are these moms filling a gap in their very own psyches to the detriment of their very own daughters’?
Your reporters have executed a superb job declaring the true risks of this apply, in addition to the challenges and obligations that Instagram and others should settle for as accomplices.
Irene Q. Powell
Gettysburg, Pa.
The author is a board member of the Adams County Kids’s Advocacy Heart.
To the Editor:
I’m certain I’m not the one one who discovered just about everybody concerned within the Instagram exploitation of women to be appalling: the mother and father who do that to their youngsters for cash; the manufacturers that pay for the exploitation; Meta executives who — shock, shock — couldn’t care much less. None of those actors appear prone to change any of this.
I discovered myself questioning, nevertheless, whether or not current (or enhanced) baby labor legal guidelines couldn’t be used to prosecute these individuals. Aren’t these youngsters primarily underage staff? Shouldn’t we deal with being a juvenile “influencer” below these circumstances like some other type of labor from which youngsters must be protected?
Steven Conn
Yellow Springs, Ohio
To the Editor:
Like most readers, I’ll guess, I learn with growing disbelief in regards to the habits of the moms who promote their daughters’ pictures on the web. I saved asking myself how they may do that. I ultimately concluded that they merely don’t perceive the evil of what they’re doing, regardless of some lame and self-serving expressions of doubt.
The place I reached that conclusion was the citation from the mother who appeared to specific umbrage at what the federal agent instructed her: “They instructed everybody to get off Instagram,” she mentioned. “‘You’re in over your head. Get off.’ That’s what they instructed us.”
That recommendation is so self-evidently proper and correct that I used to be shocked on the mother’s destructive response. Her umbrage goes a great distance in explaining how these mothers can do what they do: They inhabit a special ethical universe from something we have now seen earlier than.
I worry for the place this growing amoral universe will take its inhabitants and the remainder of us, for even these of us who don’t inhabit that universe can be affected by the habits of those that do.
To the Editor:
Re “Mitch McConnell Endorses Trump, Whom He Once Denounced” (nytimes.com, March 6):
Now that the Senate Republican minority chief, Mitch McConnell, has endorsed the presidential candidacy of Donald Trump, the query is whether or not Nikki Haley, former South Carolina governor, will equally put to the facet Mr. Trump’s insults to her mind, his slurs to the public service of her spouse, his racially tinged — if not worse — innuendo about her ethnicity, and his wicked indifference to the values and norms of our democratic republic.
Or will she, in contrast to Mr. McConnell, determine that relating to her self-respect and to the sustainability of our constitutional order, her endorsement of Mr. Trump can be one bridge too far.
Chuck Cutolo
Westbury, N.Y.
A Glimpse of the Lives Misplaced in Gaza
To the Editor:
Re “Lives Ended in Gaza” (entrance web page, March 4):
The New York Instances is the champion of describing the precise people whom we lose in violence. I learn each one of many mini-biographies of the misplaced souls of 9/11, generally crying over them.
Now we have now the valuable misplaced people in Gaza, who sound like so many people. Conflict is horrible.
Taddy McAllister
San Antonio
To the Editor:
Studying the pages that includes tragic portrayals of males, ladies and kids who’ve misplaced their lives within the Gaza conflict, we should not overlook that Hamas bears accountability for his or her deaths.
Hamas launched the unprovoked bloodbath of Israeli civilians on Oct. 7 that precipitated Israel’s navy response, sheltered among the many residential inhabitants, and stashed weapons in colleges, hospitals and mosques.
Had been it not for Hamas’s atrocities and violations of the Geneva Conference, each single a type of pictured would nonetheless be alive.
Jeffrey L. Rubenstein
New York
The author is a professor of Hebrew and Judaic research at New York College.
To the Editor:
Re “Housing Plan Gets a Yes. Community Says No” (entrance web page, March 3):
Florence, S.C., is just not the one place in America the place it’s needlessly tough to assemble new housing. Nevertheless, it seems to be a current instance of an issue plaguing America’s housing provide — exclusionary zoning.
Generally understood, the purpose of zoning is to segregate land makes use of. However its sordid historical past reveals that it has usually been co-opted by metropolis councils and vocal rabble-rousers to segregate one thing else: individuals. These forces manipulate metropolis codes to maintain low-income residents out, and the plain results of this exclusion is much less provide — making housing costlier for everybody.
Exclusionary zoning is not only morally incorrect; it’s economically counterproductive and more and more constitutionally suspect. America is within the midst of a housing affordability disaster. We will dig ourselves out of it, as long as we break away from the zoning forces which have made it unlawful to construct inexpensive housing.
Ari Bargil
Miami
The author is a senior legal professional on the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit regulation agency that fights arbitrary zoning laws nationwide.
[ad_2]
Source link