[ad_1]
To the Editor:
Re “In Pitch to Nation, Biden Says Trump Poses Dire Threat” (entrance web page, March 8):
Within the State of the Union handle we heard an aggressive and efficient Joe Biden current a transparent imaginative and prescient of America and his insurance policies for the longer term.
Whereas he spoke, we noticed a imaginative and prescient of Donald Trump’s view of America and its future by watching the facial gestures and physique language of Speaker Mike Johnson. At occasions he appeared anxious and unsure the right way to reply. It was if Mr. Trump had been speaking into his ear.
The nation has struggled with whether or not Mr. Biden has the energy and psychological agility to run the nation. The Republicans within the chamber gave him a chance to reveal that he can suppose and reply powerfully on his toes. Of their heckling they appeared and acted inept. Mr. Biden was presidential.
The burden is now on Mr. Trump to current himself clearly and handle insurance policies. Mr. Biden has set a excessive bar.
Sidney Weissman
Highland Park, In poor health.
To the Editor:
After Thursday evening’s speech, can anybody nonetheless significantly suppose the Democrats may have a greater or stronger candidate than President Biden?
It could be nice if all of the commentators who’ve spent months enjoying “fantasy Democratic Conference” lastly began devoting their commentaries and reporting to discussions and evaluation of the candidates’ concepts, precise accomplishments and aspirations for a second time period. Wager that received’t occur.
Marvin Ciporen
Brooklyn
To the Editor:
I heard little concerning the state of the union however as an alternative a bitter, shouted, accusatory litany of grievances towards President Biden’s “predecessor” and assaults on the Republican opposition.
There may be room for that in debates and campaigning, however a State of the Union handle must, if not intensify the constructive, then a minimum of preserve a hopeful tone. I heard little of that in President Biden’s handle other than an anticipated laundry checklist of accomplishments.
I may have executed with out each the high-school-level interruptions from the Republican aspect and Mr. Biden’s ready responses. All in all, a compelled, disappointing speech.
Alexander Goldstein
Brooklyn
To the Editor:
Re “Katie Britt, With Smiles and Menace, Delivers G.O.P. Response to Biden” (nytimes.com, March 8):
The G.O.P. determination to have Senator Katie Britt handle the nation from her kitchen was insulting. The Republicans would by no means have requested a person to do this.
Ms. Britt obtained the primary likelihood of her skilled profession to deal with your entire nation, and the optics went down the drain.
Dominique Browning
New York
To the Editor:
As a public well being advocate, I used to be glad to listen to President Biden leverage his annual State of the Union handle to debate the significance of reducing well being care prices for hundreds of thousands of Individuals and defending the Inexpensive Care Act.
Nonetheless, as a Latina immigrant and a pacesetter within the Latine neighborhood, I can’t overlook Mr. Biden’s use of the word “illegal” to explain an undocumented immigrant. Such phrase decisions are laced with racism and serve solely to dehumanize immigrants.
Mr. Biden has spent months distinguishing himself from Donald Trump’s and Republicans’ anti-immigrant rhetoric. It’s this distinction that he hopes will drive Latine communities to the polls in November.
His alternative of phrases doesn’t mirror these efforts, and I hope he apologizes to the immigrant neighborhood, which we all know is important to the nation.
Seciah Aquino
Los Angeles
The author is govt director of the Latino Coalition for a Wholesome California.
To the Editor:
Re “Surviving the Ugliness of It All,” by David Brooks (column, March 8):
It was so clear to me as I learn Mr. Brooks’s column about Churchill, F.D.R. and optimism for the longer term that Joe Biden did, in his State of the Union speech, simply what Mr. Brooks appears to be hoping for. A frontrunner with optimism for the longer term and an ideal religion within the American folks is what we want for and can assist.
Good luck, Joe. In the mean time you appear to be the reply to Mr. Brooks’s imaginative and prescient and my hopes.
Helene Torker
New York
Don’t Neglect the Trump Trauma
To the Editor:
Re “The Trauma of the Trump Years Is Being Rewritten,” by Charles M. Blow (column, Feb. 15):
Once I learn Mr. Blow’s column, I felt my anger rising about Donald Trump’s doable return to energy. Till Mr. Trump took workplace, I had been a sound sleeper virtually each evening. Then his chaotic administration began. I started a brand new behavior of waking up in the midst of the evening and grabbing my iPad to see what Mr. Trump had executed now. I used to be doomscrolling earlier than the time period was popularized.
Sorry to say, I not often made it again to sleep, and even sorrier to say, the behavior has remained with me considerably even with the non-drama of the Biden years.
Please, America, don’t neglect what these Trump years had been like.
Janet Robertson
Delray Seaside, Fla.
Nationwide Guard Troops within the Subway Threaten Civil Liberties
To the Editor:
Re “Hochul Deploys National Guard and State Police to Patrol City Subways” (information article, March 7):
I’m writing to specific my deep concern relating to Gov. Kathy Hochul’s determination to deploy Nationwide Guard troops to guard riders within the New York Metropolis subway system. Whereas the goal could also be to reinforce public security, the presence of armed troopers in public areas raises troubling questions concerning the steadiness between safety and civil liberties.
Guaranteeing the security of commuters is undoubtedly essential. Nonetheless, the sight of uniformed troops patrolling subway platforms evokes uncomfortable parallels with authoritarian regimes that subordinate particular person freedoms to the state’s grip on energy.
Will the presence of armed troops result in elevated racial profiling or disproportionate use of drive? How will this deployment have an effect on the already strained relationship between regulation enforcement and the communities it serves?
Calling on the Nationwide Guard additionally raises questions on addressing the foundation causes of crime and violence. Are heavy-handed ways merely a Band-Help resolution that fails to deal with underlying societal points, probably exacerbating tensions?
In occasions of disaster, governments might really feel compelled to take extraordinary measures to make sure public security. Nonetheless, it’s essential that such measures be proportionate, clear and topic to public scrutiny. The choice to deploy the Nationwide Guard within the subway calls for strong public discourse and oversight.
I urge Governor Hochul to rethink this determination and have interaction in significant dialogue with the general public to search out options that prioritize each security and civil liberties.
Keith Bernard
Queens
A Unionized Basketball Staff
To the Editor:
Re “Drive to Unionize Began in Dining Hall” (information article, March 6):
The Dartmouth males’s basketball group has voted 13-2 to unionize, an motion that the school vigorously opposes. To forestall official recognition, Dartmouth has requested a overview by the Nationwide Labor Relations Board after which probably will attraction the matter to federal courtroom.
Given the group’s file — final within the Ivy League — group members would possibly wish to take into consideration spending a bit extra time on the courtroom quite than within the courtroom.
Henry Von Kohorn
Princeton, N.J.
[ad_2]
Source link